https://castia.circuly.org/en/compare/apollo
// CASTIA VS APOLLO
Apollo finds contacts. Castia runs the motion.
Apollo is strong when the job is self-serve prospecting, contact data, and sales engagement. Castia starts when those pieces need governance, territory context, meeting handoff, and a visible operating trail.
Apollo wins when...
You need a broad contact database, low entry price, and self-serve outbound tooling.
Castia wins when...
You need source records, approvals, a shared board, field notes, and accepted opportunities handed back.
// FEATURE CHECKS
Contacts plus sequences are not the same as an operating layer.
| Capability | Apollo | Castia |
|---|---|---|
| B2B/contact database | –Core strength | ✓Uses sources and owned lists as part of a controlled workflow |
| Shared pre-CRM board | –Partial workflow surface | ✓Core operating surface |
| Human approval and suppression | –Configurable | ✓Default control model |
| Meeting prep and handoff | –Partial | ✓Built into the motion |
| Pricing lens | –Per-seat and credit-led | ✓Pilot, starter, blueprint, expansion |
// NEXT STEP
Use Apollo if contact access is the gap. Use Castia if operating the motion is the gap.
This page concedes Apollo's data strength early, then moves the buyer from contact search to controlled execution.
More comparisons